Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads — 75/100 vs 60/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3900); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is faster in AnTuTu (3,034,849 vs 1,290,942); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably lighter (163g vs 194g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 73
Battery 29
Portability 97
Value for money 62
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 45
Battery 50
Portability 57
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3034849 vs 1290942
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2970 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9490 vs 4453
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Lighter: 163g vs 194g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (73/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (97/100 vs 57/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) better?
  • Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W

  • Longer battery life (50/100 vs 29/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge vs the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge scores 15 points higher (75/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads (73/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) leads (50/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (73/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (50/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (97/100 vs 57/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China): The Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3034849 1290942
Geekbench Single 2970 1675
Geekbench Multi 9490 4453
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3900 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 140
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 158.2×75.6×5.8 mm 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm
Weight 163 g 194 g
Launch price $1099
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 16MP
45
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • 3900 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
29
battery
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3034849 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
60/100 -135.1%
1290942 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) by 135.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
$1099
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (91/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (73/100 vs 45/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (50/100 vs 29/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (97/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — 60/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads on camera score (73/100 vs 45/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads on performance (91/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge over the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a better fit for active users.