Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs Vivo X500

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $1199 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 71/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 1,762,339); the Vivo X500 is noticeably lighter (211g vs 234g).

The Vivo X500 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

Performance 76
Display 88
Camera 73
Battery 56
Portability 29
Value for money 52

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 71/100

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 1762339
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 211g vs 234g
  • Cheaper at launch: $820 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 29/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 18 points higher (89/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 leads (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — 52/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (50/100 vs 29/100).

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Vivo X500
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
AnTuTu 1762339 3930719
Geekbench Single 2004 3302
Geekbench Multi 5311 10240
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3088 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 140 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 64 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1750 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.4×78.1×8.9 mm 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm
Weight 234 g 211 g
Launch price $1199 $820

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3088
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
71/100
1762339 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100 +55.2%
3930719 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 leads Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra by 55.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

$1199

Vivo X500

$820

Launch price difference: $379. Vivo X500 was $379 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (96/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (87/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (84/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (50/100 vs 29/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra over the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.