Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Vivo X500

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2200, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $1199 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 67/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 1,434,169); the Vivo X500 is noticeably lighter (211g vs 228g).

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra by 22 points (89/100 vs 67/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Performance 68
Display 88
Camera 69
Battery 56
Portability 33
Value for money 44

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 67/100

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 1434169
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 1588
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 3958
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 211g vs 228g
  • Cheaper at launch: $820 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 69/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 33/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 22 points higher (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 leads (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra — 44/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (96/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (50/100 vs 33/100).

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Vivo X500
Processor Samsung Exynos 2200 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
AnTuTu 1434169 3930719
Geekbench Single 1588 3302
Geekbench Multi 3958 10240
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 3088x1440 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 135 —
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 64 MP
Front camera 40 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1750 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.3×77.9×8.9 mm 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm
Weight 228 g 211 g
Launch price $1199 $820

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 40MP
69
camera

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3088x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Samsung Exynos 2200
67/100
1434169 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100 +63.5%
3930719 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 leads Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra by 63.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

$1199

Vivo X500

$820

Launch price difference: $379. Vivo X500 was $379 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (96/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (87/100 vs 69/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (84/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (50/100 vs 33/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra by 22 points (89/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 69/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra over the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.