Samsung Galaxy M33 5G vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Samsung Galaxy M33 5G (2022) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. Both devices score the same overall rating of 45/100. Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G is faster in AnTuTu (615,425 vs 593,307); the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M33 5G better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 615425 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 956 vs 915
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better camera (32/100 vs 30/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2299 vs 2082
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Lighter: 194g vs 198g
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 45/100)
Comparison verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M33 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China) received the same MobileRank rating — 45/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M33 5G | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 615425 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 956 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2082 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.6" TFT LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×76.9×9.4 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M33 5G and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 3.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Both devices scored 45/100. They are identical on performance — 47/100 for both. The clearest difference is portability: better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (56/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy M33 5G has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (56/100 vs 45/100).