Samsung Galaxy M17 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 26/100 vs 11/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy M17
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 15 points higher (26/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $130 | — |
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (76/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.