Samsung Galaxy M16 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M16 leads — 23/100 vs 11/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy M16
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M16 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy M16 scores 12 points higher (23/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M16 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M16 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.