Samsung Galaxy M16 vs Tecno Pova 6
The Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Tecno Pova 6 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 6 leads — 49/100 vs 45/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 6 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 206g).
Samsung Galaxy M16
Tecno Pova 6
- Lighter: 191g vs 206g
- Better display (67/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (65/100 vs 56/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (39/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M16 vs the Tecno Pova 6, the Tecno Pova 6 scores 4 points higher (49/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 leads (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Tecno Pova 6 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 is a bit better (39/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M16 | Tecno Pova 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 70W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 14, HIOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 166.2×76.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Tecno Pova 6
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Pova 6
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 6
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy M16 and Tecno Pova 6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Samsung Galaxy M16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Tecno Pova 6 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 is a bit better (39/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (61/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Tecno Pova 6?
The Tecno Pova 6 edges out the Samsung Galaxy M16 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Tecno Pova 6?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Tecno Pova 6 — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Tecno Pova 6?
The Tecno Pova 6 leads on camera score (39/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M16 over the Tecno Pova 6?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova 6 is a better fit for everyday use.