OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M16
The OPPO Find X9 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5000); the OPPO Find X9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,508,681 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy M16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 217g).
OPPO Find X9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Higher AnTuTu: 3508681 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10800 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
- Lighter: 191g vs 217g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy M16, the OPPO Find X9 Pro scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (83/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (93/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (83/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Pro (65/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy M16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3508681 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2900 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10800 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2780x1264 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 166 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / ColorOS 15.2 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.5×8.3 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $1199 | — |
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2780x1264
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 19:04 hrs, total 35:19 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Find X9 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M16 by 568.6% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy M16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (94/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (93/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (83/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Pro (65/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy M16 — 45/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on camera score (93/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy M16?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M16 is a better fit for everyday use.