Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 850, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $149 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 31/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 234,339); the Samsung Galaxy M13 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M13
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $149 vs $548
- Better portability (68/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 234339
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 836
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 16/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 44 points higher (75/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M13 — 36/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (95/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (68/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 850 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $149 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M13 by 93.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $399. Samsung Galaxy M13 was $399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (95/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (99/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (80/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (68/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 by 44 points (75/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.