Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (2022) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) leads — 18/100 vs 11/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 207g).
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
Vivo Y32t
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 36/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 207g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) scores 7 points higher (18/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (76/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 850 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×76.9×9.3 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (76/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.