Samsung Galaxy F36 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Samsung Galaxy F36 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $245 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 51/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 767,711); the Samsung Galaxy F36 is noticeably lighter (197g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F36
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Samsung Galaxy F36 better?
- Lighter: 197g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $245 vs $280
- Better portability (64/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 767711
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2710
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F36 vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 20 points higher (71/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy F36 — 52/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 (88/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Samsung Galaxy F36 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F36 is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F36 | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 767711 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2710 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.7 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $245 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F36
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F36
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F36
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F36 and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Samsung Galaxy F36 by 72.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $35. Samsung Galaxy F36 was $35 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 (88/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ and the Samsung Galaxy F36 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 (73/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F36 is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F36 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F36 by 20 points (71/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F36 and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Samsung Galaxy F36 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F36 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F36 over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.