Samsung Galaxy F07 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy F07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy F07 leads — 25/100 vs 11/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP.
Samsung Galaxy F07
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 184g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 70/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F07 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy F07 scores 14 points higher (25/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (93/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F07 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 408000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $240 | — |
Samsung Galaxy F07
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy F07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy F07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy F07 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (93/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F07 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F07 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F07 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F07 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F07 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F07 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F07 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy F07 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.