Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Vivo V20
The Samsung Galaxy A72 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo V20 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo V20 leads — 49/100 vs 46/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A72 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo V20 is noticeably lighter (171g vs 203g).
Samsung Galaxy A72
Vivo V20
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 25/100)
- Lighter: 171g vs 203g
- Better camera (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 68/100)
- Better portability (83/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A72 vs the Vivo V20, the Vivo V20 scores 3 points higher (49/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V20 leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 leads (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo V20 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo V20 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 notably outperforms the Vivo V20 (52/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V20 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (83/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Vivo V20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | |
| AnTuTu | 514398 | 514398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | 1762 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 33W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11, Funtouch 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×77.4×8.4 mm | 161.3×74.2×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 171 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Main: 64MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo V20
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Samsung Galaxy A72
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo V20
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A72
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo V20
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy A72 and Vivo V20, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Vivo V20
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 41/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo V20 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (84/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo V20 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (51/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 notably outperforms the Vivo V20 (52/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V20 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (83/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo V20?
The Vivo V20 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A72 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A72 and the Vivo V20?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo V20 — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo V20?
The Vivo V20 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 36/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 over the Vivo V20?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo V20 is a better fit for everyday use.