Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Samsung Galaxy A71 (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 730, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 leads — 26/100 vs 22/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A71 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A71
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Better camera (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (77/100 vs 55/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 173g vs 179g
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 76/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A71 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Vivo iQOO Z7 scores 4 points higher (26/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 leads (77/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A71 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (77/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A71 | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 730 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 496392 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 724 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | — | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×76.0×7.7 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 173 g | |
| Price | $470 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A71
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A71 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A71 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (77/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A71 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A71 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A71 and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A71 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A71 over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.