Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy A55 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1480, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $449 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 55/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,031,048).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 by 34 points (89/100 vs 55/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A55
Performance 58
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 44
Portability 49
Value for money 42
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy A55 better?
  • Lighter: 213g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $799

  • Better portability (49/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1031048
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3200
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A55 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 34 points higher (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A55 — 42/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100).

Samsung Galaxy A55: The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A55 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 1480 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1031048 4602290
Geekbench Single 1050 3640
Geekbench Multi 3200 11033
Display 6.6" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 108
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 161.1×77.4×8.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 213 g 227 g
Launch price $449 $799
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A55
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 13MP
48
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A55
  • 6.6" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A55
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A55 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Samsung Exynos 1480
55/100
1031048 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +77.6%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A55 by 77.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A55
$449
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Launch price difference: $350. Samsung Galaxy A55 was $350 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (99/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (78/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 (92/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A55 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55 by 34 points (89/100 vs 55/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A55 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy A55 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A55 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A55 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A55 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy A55 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.