Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo iQOO Z7
The Samsung Galaxy A52 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A52 leads — 27/100 vs 26/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A52 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 is noticeably lighter (173g vs 189g).
Samsung Galaxy A52
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Better camera (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 173g vs 189g
- Longer battery life (30/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 63/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A52 vs the Vivo iQOO Z7, the Samsung Galaxy A52 scores 1 points higher (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo iQOO Z7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 514398 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | — | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 159.9×75.1×8.4 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 173 g | |
| Price | $400 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z7
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A52
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A52
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 is a bit better (30/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (83/100 vs 63/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A52 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 edges out the Vivo iQOO Z7 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A52 or the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 over the Vivo iQOO Z7?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for everyday use.