Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The Samsung Galaxy A52 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $400 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 46/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 517,460); the Samsung Galaxy A52 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 216g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A52
Vivo iQOO 15T
What makes Samsung Galaxy A52 better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 216g
- Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $499
- Better portability (61/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 517460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1762
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (65/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A52 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 36 points higher (82/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A52 — 20/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (97/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (65/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (75/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (61/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 517460 | 4704310 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.9×75.1×8.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 189 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | $400 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A52
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A52
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A52 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy A52 by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $99. Samsung Galaxy A52 was $99 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (97/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (99/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (65/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (75/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (61/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A52 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 by 36 points (82/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A52 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A52 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A52 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.