Samsung Galaxy A40 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A40 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7904, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). Both devices score the same overall rating of 11/100. Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3100); the main camera is 16 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A40 is noticeably lighter (140g vs 179g).
Samsung Galaxy A40
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 16MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 140g vs 179g
- Better camera (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3100 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
The Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Vivo Y32t received the same MobileRank rating — 11/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (93/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A40 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7904 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 241600 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 330 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 975 | — | |
| Display | 5.9" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3100 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 25 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 144.4×69.2×7.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 140 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $250 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A40
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 25MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A40
- 5.9" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A40
- 3100 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A40 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (93/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A40 or the Vivo Y32t?
Both devices scored 11/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo Y32t.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A40 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A40 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A40 leads on camera score (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A40 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A40 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.