Samsung Galaxy A30 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy A30 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7904, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $220 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 26/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 257,901); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A30 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A30 is noticeably lighter (165g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 by 63 points (89/100 vs 26/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A30

Performance 19
Display 51
Camera 14
Battery 25
Portability 83
Value for money 8

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy A30 better?

  • Lighter: 165g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $799

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 257901
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 330
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 975
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 14/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A30 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 63 points higher (89/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A30 — 8/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (99/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (78/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (92/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (83/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A30 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 7904 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 257901 4602290
Geekbench Single 330 3639
Geekbench Multi 975 11047
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution — 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging — 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 16 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS — Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 8000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 158.5×74.7×7.7 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 165 g 227 g
Launch price $220 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A30

  • Main: 16MP
  • Front: 16MP
14
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A30

  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A30

  • 4000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
25
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A30 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A30 Samsung Exynos 7904
26/100
257901 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +94.4%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A30 by 94.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A30

$220

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $579. Samsung Galaxy A30 was $579 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (99/100 vs 19/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (78/100 vs 14/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (92/100 vs 25/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (83/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A30 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 by 63 points (89/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A30 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy A30 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A30 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 14/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A30 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 19/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A30 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.