Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A25 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A25 leads — 32/100 vs 11/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A25 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 197g).
Samsung Galaxy A25
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (29/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 197g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 53/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A25 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A25 scores 21 points higher (32/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 leads (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A25 (76/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A25 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 613957 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 957 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2095 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×76.5×8.3 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $204 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A25
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A25
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A25
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A25 (76/100 vs 53/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A25 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A25 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 21 points (32/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A25 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A25 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A25 leads on camera score (29/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A25 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A25 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.