Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G leads — 24/100 vs 11/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 195g).
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 195g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G scores 13 points higher (24/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G (76/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 408000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×77.6×8.3 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (28/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G (76/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.