Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A20 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7884, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). Both devices score the same overall rating of 11/100. Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy A20 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A20
Vivo Y32t
- Lighter: 169g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (88/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
The Samsung Galaxy A20 and the Vivo Y32t received the same MobileRank rating — 11/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 is a bit better (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A20 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7884 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 156000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 254 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 802 | — | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×74.7×7.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 169 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $190 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A20
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A20
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A20
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 is a bit better (88/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo Y32t?
Both devices scored 11/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo Y32t.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A20 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A20 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A20 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.