Samsung Galaxy A17 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11
The Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $147 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 45/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 552,286); the Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 210g).
Samsung Galaxy A17
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Lighter: 190g vs 210g
- Cheaper at launch: $147 vs $400
- Better portability (70/100 vs 49/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 67/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A17 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 31 points higher (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (99/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (92/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (70/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (90/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A17 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 3154662 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 190 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $147 | $400 |
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Samsung Galaxy A17 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Samsung Galaxy A17 by 82.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $253. Samsung Galaxy A17 was $253 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (92/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (99/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (92/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (70/100 vs 49/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (90/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A17 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 by 31 points (76/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A17 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A17 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.