Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $199 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 44/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 607,489); per DXOMark lab testing, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has the stronger camera (145 vs 77); the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is noticeably lighter (200g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 5G better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Lighter: 200g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $199 vs $1999
- Longer battery life (44/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 992
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2197
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (78/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 31 points higher (75/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A16 5G — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (76/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 992 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2197 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 77 | 145 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $199 | $1999 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 80.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1800. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G was $1800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (91/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (76/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 31 points (75/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.