Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $199 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 44/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 607,489); per DXOMark lab testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the stronger camera (151 vs 77); the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is noticeably lighter (200g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 5G better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $199 vs $1299
- Better portability (60/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 992
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 2197
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 36 points higher (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (56/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A16 5G — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (92/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (88/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (81/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 3128552 | |
| Geekbench Single | 992 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2197 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 77 | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $199 | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 80.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1100. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G was $1100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (92/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (88/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G (81/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G by 36 points (80/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.