Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy A12 (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A12 leads — 30/100 vs 28/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 199,111); the Samsung Galaxy A12 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 205g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A12
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy A12 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 476 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 828 vs 779
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (29/100 vs 10/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 199111
- Lighter: 179g vs 205g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A12 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy A12 scores 2 points higher (30/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A12 leads (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Samsung Galaxy A12 are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A12 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 (68/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A12 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.8×8.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $180 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A12
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A12
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A12
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A12 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Samsung Galaxy A12 by 34.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Samsung Galaxy A12 are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A12 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A12 (68/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A12 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A12 edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A12 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A12 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy A12 leads on camera score (29/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A12 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 46/100).