Samsung Galaxy A03s vs Vivo Y16

The Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo Y16 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y16 leads — 30/100 vs 25/100 (a 5-point difference).

The Vivo Y16 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03s by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A03s

Performance 19
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 50
Value for money 30

Vivo Y16

Performance 19
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 67
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy A03s better?


  • Overall rating 25/100

What makes Vivo Y16 better?

  • Lighter: 184g vs 196g

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (39/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (67/100 vs 50/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03s vs the Vivo Y16, the Vivo Y16 scores 5 points higher (30/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 19/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (67/100 vs 50/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A03s Vivo Y16
Processor MediaTek Helio P35 MediaTek Helio P35
AnTuTu 199111 199111
Geekbench Single 476 476
Geekbench Multi 828 828
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution — 720x1600
Refresh rate 60 Hz —
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging — —
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Front camera 5 MP 5 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB / 4GB 3GB / 4GB
Storage 32GB 32GB / 64GB / 128GB
OS — Android 12, Funtouch 12
NFC no no
Dimensions 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm 164.0×75.6×8.2 mm
Weight 196 g 184 g
Launch price $130 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Vivo Y16

  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Vivo Y16

  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Vivo Y16

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A03s and Vivo Y16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A03s MediaTek Helio P35
25/100
199111 AnTuTu
Vivo Y16 MediaTek Helio P35
30/100
199111 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A03s

$130

Vivo Y16

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 19/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (67/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03s or the Vivo Y16?

The Vivo Y16 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03s by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03s and the Vivo Y16?

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y16 — 30/100.

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03s over the Vivo Y16?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y16 (67/100 vs 50/100).