Samsung Galaxy A03 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) and the Xiaomi 17 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 43/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't; the Xiaomi 17 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A03
Xiaomi 17 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 better?
- Overall rating 43/100
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6300 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 196g
- Better camera (81/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro, the Xiaomi 17 Pro scores 43 points higher (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (81/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (81/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A03 | Xiaomi 17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3569354 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3310 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10070 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS TFT | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2656x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6300 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | 151.1×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $825 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2656x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (85/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (81/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (84/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 43 points (86/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.