Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $300 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 24/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,728,128 vs 153,667); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is noticeably lighter (196g vs 219g).
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Higher AnTuTu: 2728128 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 32/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 32/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 219g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $300
- Better portability (50/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 47 points higher (71/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (88/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (88/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (37/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (84/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 2728128 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 846 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $100 |
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 1675.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $200 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (88/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (84/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (37/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (84/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 47 points (71/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on camera score (37/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (88/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.