Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Both devices score the same overall rating of 71/100. Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,728,128); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 8.2mm).
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2728128
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2680
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8358
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 88/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 54/100)
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide received the same MobileRank rating — 71/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 88/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (80/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (76/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2728128 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | 1828x2584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 199 g | |
| Price | $300 | — |
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Redmi Turbo 5 Max by 12.5% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (92/100 vs 88/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (80/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (76/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
Both devices scored 71/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.