Redmi Note 9S vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Redmi Note 9S (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 39/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 9S has the bigger battery (5020 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 514,398); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 9S doesn't.
Redmi Note 9S
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Bigger battery: 5020 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 39/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 514398
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1762
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 204g vs 210g
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 42/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 9S vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 32 points higher (71/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (69/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (69/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (80/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (86/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 9S | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 514398 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $200 | — |
Redmi Note 9S
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 9S
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 9S
- 5020 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Note 9S and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Redmi Note 9S by 60.2% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (69/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (80/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (86/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 9S or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 32 points (71/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 9S and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Redmi Note 9S has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 9S or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 9S or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (69/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 9S over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.