Redmi Note 9S vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Redmi Note 9S (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $200 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 88/100 vs 39/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,593,401 vs 514,398); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 9S doesn't; the Redmi Note 9S is noticeably lighter (210g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 49 points (88/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 9S
Performance 41
Display 42
Camera 34
Battery 43
Portability 44
Value for money 40
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88
What makes Redmi Note 9S better?
  • Lighter: 210g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $999

  • Better portability (44/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3593401 vs 514398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1762
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5020 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 9S vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 49 points higher (88/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Redmi Note 9S — 40/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (96/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (93/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (80/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 9S and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).

Redmi Note 9S: The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 9S Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 514398 3593401
Geekbench Single 746 3640
Geekbench Multi 1762 11033
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 3200x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5020 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 166
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 450 nits 3500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 210 g 226 g
Launch price $200 $999
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 9S
  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 9S
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
42
display
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 9S
  • 5020 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 9S and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
39/100
514398 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +85.7%
3593401 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Redmi Note 9S by 85.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 9S
$200
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
$999

Launch price difference: $799. Redmi Note 9S was $799 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (96/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (89/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (93/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (80/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 9S and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 9S or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 49 points (88/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 9S and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 9S has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 9S or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 9S or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 9S over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.