Redmi Note 9S vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

The Redmi Note 9S (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $200 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads — 63/100 vs 39/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,030,590 vs 514,398); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 9S doesn't; the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 210g).

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 24 points (63/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 9S
Performance 41
Display 42
Camera 34
Battery 43
Portability 44
Value for money 40
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 61
Battery 58
Portability 74
Value for money 80
What makes Redmi Note 9S better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $249

  • Overall rating 39/100
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1030590 vs 514398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1762
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5020 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 178g vs 210g

  • Higher performance (58/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (61/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (82/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 9S vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra scores 24 points higher (63/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Redmi Note 9S — 40/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (58/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (82/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (61/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (58/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (74/100 vs 44/100).

Redmi Note 9S: The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra: The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 9S Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
AnTuTu 514398 1030590
Geekbench Single 746 1061
Geekbench Multi 1762 3185
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1208x2644
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5020 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 18W 45W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 450 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm
Weight 210 g 178 g
Launch price $200 $249
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 9S
  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 9S
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
42
display
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 9S
  • 5020 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 9S and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
39/100
514398 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
63/100 +50.1%
1030590 AnTuTu

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads Redmi Note 9S by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 9S
$200
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
$249

Launch price difference: $49. Redmi Note 9S was $49 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (58/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (82/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (61/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (58/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (74/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 9S or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 24 points (63/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 9S and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 9S has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 9S or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 9S or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads on performance (58/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 9S over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.