Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; estimated prices are $561 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 84/100 vs 39/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6500); the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (4,119,955 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 210g).
Redmi K90 Pro Max
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 4119955 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 5/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 54/100)
- Lighter: 178g vs 210g
- Cheaper: $249 vs $561
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 71/100)
Comparing the Redmi K90 Pro Max vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 45 points higher (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (94/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (74/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 5/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (74/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (77/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (93/100 vs 71/100).
| Specification | Redmi K90 Pro Max | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 4119955 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.9" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2608x1200 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 178 g | |
| Price | $561 | $249 |
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- 6.9" OLED
- Resolution: 2608x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi K90 Pro Max and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 299.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $312. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is cheaper by $312.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 5/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (74/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (82/100 vs 54/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (77/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (93/100 vs 71/100).
Which is better: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 45 points (84/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (74/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (94/100 vs 5/100).
Should you choose the Redmi K90 Pro Max over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.