Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

The Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $561 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 86/100 vs 73/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5100); the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,622,315 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 210g).

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K90 Pro Max

Performance 97
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 89
Portability 54
Value for money 90

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

What makes Redmi K90 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3622315 vs 1724757
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4313
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 70W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 56/100)

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 193g vs 210g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $561

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Pro Max vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 13 points higher (86/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (97/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Pro Max — 90/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (97/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Redmi K90 Pro Max are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).

Redmi K90 Pro Max: The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K90 Pro Max Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350
AnTuTu 3622315 1724757
Geekbench Single 3639 1398
Geekbench Multi 11047 4313
Display 6.9" OLED 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2608x1200 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 5100 mAh
Charging 100W 70W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm
Weight 210 g 193 g
Launch price $561 $450

Camera comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Pro Max and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
3622315 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100 -110.0%
1724757 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 110.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K90 Pro Max

$561

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Launch price difference: $111. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $111 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (97/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Redmi K90 Pro Max are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (89/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Pro Max over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.