Redmi Note 3 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16

Comparing the Redmi Note 3 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 71 points higher (89/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 3/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Redmi Note 3 Pro — 4/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (100/100 vs 3/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (99/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (90/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 3 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (73/100 vs 42/100).

Launch price difference: $670. Redmi Note 3 Pro was $670 cheaper at launch.