Redmi Note 3 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Redmi Note 3 Pro (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $170 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 18/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4050); the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 3 Pro doesn't; the Redmi Note 3 Pro is noticeably lighter (164g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 3 Pro
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Redmi Note 3 Pro better?
- Lighter: 164g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $170 vs $650
- Better portability (73/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 270
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 800
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4050 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 3/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 3 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 66 points higher (84/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 3/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Redmi Note 3 Pro — 4/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (91/100 vs 3/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (99/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (73/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 3 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (73/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 3 Pro | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 270 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 800 | 9287 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4050 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 16GB / 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 150.0×76.0×8.7 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 164 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $170 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 3 Pro
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 3 Pro
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 3 Pro
- 4050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $480. Redmi Note 3 Pro was $480 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (91/100 vs 3/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (99/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (78/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro (73/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 3 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (73/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 3 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 3 Pro by 66 points (84/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 3 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 3 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 3 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 3 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 3/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 3 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.