Redmi Note 15 Special vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Redmi Note 15 Special (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 69/100 vs 54/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 15 Special has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 840,643); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 15 Special doesn't; the Redmi Note 15 Special is noticeably lighter (178g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Special — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 15 Special
Performance 55
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 55
Portability 79
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Performance 92
Display 78
Camera 52
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money
What makes Redmi Note 15 Special better?
  • Bigger battery: 5800 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 178g vs 215g

  • Longer battery life (55/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 840643
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2920
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Special vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 15 points higher (69/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special leads (55/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Special (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Special (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (55/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).

Redmi Note 15 Special: The Redmi Note 15 Special is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 15 Special Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 840643 3119308
Geekbench Single 1015 3041
Geekbench Multi 2920 9494
Display 6.8" AMOLED 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 1080x2392 1968x2184
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5800 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 45W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 3 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP66 IP48
Dimensions 164.0×75.4×7.4 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 178 g 215 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 15 Special
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 20MP
34
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 15 Special
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 15 Special
  • 5800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
55
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 15 Special and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 15 Special Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
54/100
840643 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +73.1%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Redmi Note 15 Special by 73.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Special (92/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Special (52/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (55/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Special is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Special or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Special — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Special and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi Note 15 Special has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Special or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (52/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Special or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Special over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi Note 15 Special is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.