Redmi Note 15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Redmi Note 15 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $300 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 59/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 15 Pro has the bigger battery (6580 mAh vs 4400); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 876,387); the Redmi Note 15 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 15 Pro

Performance 56
Display 83
Camera 49
Battery 58
Portability 65
Value for money 56

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6580 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 190g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 78/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 876387
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2939

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 65/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 16 points higher (75/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro leads (58/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Redmi Note 15 Pro — 56/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (76/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (58/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Redmi Note 15 Pro are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 15 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 876387 3065623
Geekbench Single 1050 2910
Geekbench Multi 2939 9174
Display 6.8" AMOLED 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2700x1224 2184x1968
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6580 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 45W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 145
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×8.0 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 190 g 215 g
Launch price $300 $1999

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 15 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
49
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 15 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2700x1224
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 15 Pro

  • 6580 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 15 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 15 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra
59/100
876387 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 +71.4%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Redmi Note 15 Pro by 71.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 15 Pro

$300

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Launch price difference: $1699. Redmi Note 15 Pro was $1699 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (91/100 vs 56/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (76/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (58/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Redmi Note 15 Pro are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi Note 15 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 56/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.