Redmi Note 13 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $200 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 45/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 467,392); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 75); the Redmi Note 13 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).
Redmi Note 13
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 188g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $950
- Better portability (72/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 467392
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1396
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 33/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 46 points higher (91/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 — 52/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (99/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 13 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (96/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 75 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $200 | $950 |
Redmi Note 13
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 13 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $750. Redmi Note 13 was $750 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (99/100 vs 33/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 13 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (96/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 by 46 points (91/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.