Redmi Note 13 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $200 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 46/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 476,175); the Redmi Note 13 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 13 better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $548
- Better portability (72/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 476175
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1396
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 34/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 29 points higher (75/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (35/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Redmi Note 13 — 52/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (95/100 vs 34/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (72/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 75 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $200 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 by 86.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $348. Redmi Note 13 was $348 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (95/100 vs 34/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (72/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 by 29 points (75/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on camera score (35/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.