Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 794,638); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 120); the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Better portability (67/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 794638
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1015
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2687
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (99/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (85/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (67/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 794638 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1015 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2687 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 120 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×74.2×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1220x2712
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G by 81.3% in our overall performance rating.
Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (99/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (85/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (67/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.