Redmi Note 13 (China) vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 50/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 573,460); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 13 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 13 (China) is noticeably lighter (173g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 (China)
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 13 (China) better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 173g vs 225g
- Better camera (41/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 573460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 (China) vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 25 points higher (75/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (95/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) is a bit better (41/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (79/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 (China) | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×75.0×7.6 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 173 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | — | $548 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- Main: 108MP f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 (China) and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 (China) by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 13 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (95/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) is a bit better (41/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (79/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) by 25 points (75/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 (China) and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 (China) leads on camera score (41/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 (China) over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.