Redmi Note 13 (China) vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi Note 13 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 573,460); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 13 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 13 (China) is noticeably lighter (173g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 13 (China)

Performance 44
Display 79
Camera 41
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money —

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Redmi Note 13 (China) better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 173g vs 227g

  • Better portability (79/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 573460
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2020
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 33W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 41/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 13 (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (78/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (92/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (79/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 13 (China) Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6080 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 573460 4602290
Geekbench Single 750 3639
Geekbench Multi 2020 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 33W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, MIUI 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 8000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 161.1×75.0×7.6 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 173 g 227 g
Launch price — $799

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 13 (China)

  • Main: 108MP f/1.7
  • Front: 16MP
41
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 13 (China)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 13 (China)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 13 (China) and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 13 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 6080
50/100
573460 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +87.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 (China) by 87.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 13 (China)

Price unknown

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (99/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (78/100 vs 41/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (92/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (79/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 13 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 41/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 (China) over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.