Redmi Note 13 4G vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 13 4G leads — 36/100 vs 22/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE V40 Pro has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the Redmi Note 13 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't.
Redmi Note 13 4G
ZTE V40 Pro
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 190g
- Better camera (41/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 62/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 4G vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Redmi Note 13 4G scores 14 points higher (36/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro leads (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (41/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (65/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 469734 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $146 | — |
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (41/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (65/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Redmi Note 13 4G is noticeably better than the ZTE V40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Redmi Note 13 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.