Honor X9a vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Honor X9a (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X9a leads — 36/100 vs 22/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X9a has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't; the Honor X9a is noticeably lighter (175g vs 190g).
Honor X9a
ZTE V40 Pro
- Lighter: 175g vs 190g
- Better camera (39/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 62/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 65W vs 40W
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Honor X9a vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Honor X9a scores 14 points higher (36/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor X9a leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X9a significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X9a and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 44/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X9a notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (81/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor X9a significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X9a | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.9×7.9 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $350 | — |
Honor X9a
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X9a
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X9a
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X9a significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X9a and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 44/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X9a notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (81/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor X9a significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X9a or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Honor X9a is noticeably better than the ZTE V40 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X9a and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Honor X9a has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 22/100.
Should you choose the Honor X9a over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Honor X9a is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.