Redmi Note 13 4G vs Vivo Y200 4G
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo Y200 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. Both devices score the same overall rating of 46/100. Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Note 13 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y200 4G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 4G
Vivo Y200 4G
What makes Redmi Note 13 4G better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (44/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Vivo Y200 4G better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
The Redmi Note 13 4G and the Vivo Y200 4G received the same MobileRank rating — 46/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 4G leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G is a bit better (44/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | Vivo Y200 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 476175 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y200 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 13 4G and Vivo Y200 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G is a bit better (44/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Vivo Y200 4G?
Both devices scored 46/100. They are identical on performance — 34/100 for both. The clearest difference is battery life: better on the Vivo Y200 4G (56/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Vivo Y200 4G?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo Y200 4G — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Vivo Y200 4G?
The Redmi Note 13 4G leads on camera score (44/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the Vivo Y200 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y200 4G (56/100 vs 46/100).