Redmi Note 13 4G vs Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
The Redmi Note 13 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. Both devices score the same overall rating of 46/100. Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Note 13 4G is faster in AnTuTu (471,425 vs 467,392).
Redmi Note 13 4G
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- Higher AnTuTu: 471425 vs 467392
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (34/100 vs 33/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 37/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 67/100)
The Redmi Note 13 4G and the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) received the same MobileRank rating — 46/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G is a bit better (44/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 4G | Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 471425 | 467392 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×75.6×8.0 mm | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Redmi Note 13 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Note 13 4G and Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Note 13 4G leads Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) are nearly equal (34/100 vs 33/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 4G is a bit better (44/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) and the Redmi Note 13 4G are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)?
Both devices scored 46/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Redmi Note 13 4G.
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 4G and the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)?
The Redmi Note 13 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 4G or the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)?
The Redmi Note 13 4G leads on camera score (44/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 4G over the Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN)?
The Redmi Note 13 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo V40 Lite 4G (IDN) is a better fit for everyday use.