Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Tecno Spark 10C

The Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Spark 10C (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $561 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 86/100 vs 21/100 (a 65-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (4,119,955 vs 153,667); the Redmi K90 Pro Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark 10C doesn't; the Tecno Spark 10C is noticeably lighter (189g vs 210g).

The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C by 65 points (86/100 vs 21/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K90 Pro Max
Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 89
Portability 54
Value for money 90
Tecno Spark 10C
Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 60
Value for money 26
What makes Redmi K90 Pro Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4119955 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Tecno Spark 10C better?
  • Lighter: 189g vs 210g
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $561

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Pro Max vs the Tecno Spark 10C, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 65 points higher (86/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Pro Max — 90/100, Tecno Spark 10C — 26/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (98/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 10C is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100).

Redmi K90 Pro Max: The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Tecno Spark 10C: The Tecno Spark 10C is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K90 Pro Max Tecno Spark 10C
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu 4119955 153667
Geekbench Single 3640 205
Geekbench Multi 11033 846
Display 6.9" OLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 2608x1200 720x1612
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 18W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 5 MP
RAM 16GB 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 16 Android, HIOS 8.6
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 163.9×75.5×8.5 mm
Weight 210 g 189 g
Launch price $561 $100
Camera comparison
Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Tecno Spark 10C
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Tecno Spark 10C
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K90 Pro Max
  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery
Tecno Spark 10C
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Pro Max and Tecno Spark 10C, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
4119955 AnTuTu
Tecno Spark 10C Unisoc SC9863A
21/100 -2581.1%
153667 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Tecno Spark 10C by 2581.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi K90 Pro Max
$561
Tecno Spark 10C
$100

Launch price difference: $461. Tecno Spark 10C was $461 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (98/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (81/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (78/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C (89/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 10C is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Spark 10C?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 10C by 65 points (86/100 vs 21/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Tecno Spark 10C?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Tecno Spark 10C — 21/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Spark 10C?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Tecno Spark 10C?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Pro Max over the Tecno Spark 10C?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Spark 10C is a better fit for everyday use.