Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy J5 2017

The Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870; launch prices were $561 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 86/100 vs 21/100 (a 65-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,622,315 vs 192,269); the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 is noticeably lighter (160g vs 210g).

The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 by 65 points (86/100 vs 21/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K90 Pro Max

Performance 97
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 89
Portability 54
Value for money 90

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017

Performance 11
Display 51
Camera 12
Battery 15
Portability 84
Value for money 0

What makes Redmi K90 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3622315 vs 192269
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 172
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 492
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 11/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 12/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 better?

  • Lighter: 160g vs 210g
  • Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $561

  • Better portability (84/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Pro Max vs the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 65 points higher (86/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (97/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Pro Max — 90/100, Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 — 0/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (97/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (78/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (89/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (84/100 vs 54/100).

Redmi K90 Pro Max: The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K90 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy J5 2017
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Samsung Exynos 7870
AnTuTu 3622315 192269
Geekbench Single 3639 172
Geekbench Multi 11047 492
Display 6.9" OLED 5.2" AMOLED
Resolution 2608x1200 —
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 3000 mAh
Charging 100W —
Wireless charging 50W —
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 2GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 16GB
OS Android 16 —
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 146.2×71.3×8.0 mm
Weight 210 g 160 g
Launch price $561 $280

Camera comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
12
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017

  • 5.2" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017

  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy J5 2017, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
3622315 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870
21/100 -1784.0%
192269 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 by 1784.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K90 Pro Max

$561

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017

$280

Launch price difference: $281. Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 was $281 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (97/100 vs 11/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (81/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (78/100 vs 12/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 (89/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (84/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 by 65 points (86/100 vs 21/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 — 21/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (78/100 vs 12/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 11/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Pro Max over the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.